Should they stay or should they go?

[mcroft]

[Poll #1119608]

So, a lot of my recent entries have been from twitter, and I've posted to the Journal less, perhaps as a result of having twitter as an option. There may be other reasons, including getting settled in the new job, house, schedule, etc.

I looked at my page recently and saw how much of it was twitter and wondered if it was redundant. Should I bridge the two, or use them separately? I know that I don't follow both if someone is, for instance, mirroring every post to a blog and LJ. Maybe Twitter is the same way.

I may not make any change, or I may not take the advice of collective wisdom, but I'm wondering what people think.

ETA: I found a new feature in the UI, which lets me turn off response (@SoAndSo) tweets being logged. If that changes your opinion, please feel free to change your vote.

Comments

[goldfired.livejournal.com]

Twitters that reflect on your day in bite-sized chunks can be interesting. Twitters that are a response to someone else's twitter are ... chaff. I imagine there's no way to distinguish between them?

[gentlyepigrams]

I checked and they've added that feature. I've just turned replies off in my feed.

[goldfired.livejournal.com]

I enjoyed the journey south you wrote about - but the half conversations seem embarrassingly like eavesdropping. :-)