Should they stay or should they go?
Jan. 11th, 2008 10:33 am[Poll #1119608]
So, a lot of my recent entries have been from twitter, and I've posted to the Journal less, perhaps as a result of having twitter as an option. There may be other reasons, including getting settled in the new job, house, schedule, etc.
I looked at my page recently and saw how much of it was twitter and wondered if it was redundant. Should I bridge the two, or use them separately? I know that I don't follow both if someone is, for instance, mirroring every post to a blog and LJ. Maybe Twitter is the same way.
I may not make any change, or I may not take the advice of collective wisdom, but I'm wondering what people think.
ETA: I found a new feature in the UI, which lets me turn off response (@SoAndSo) tweets being logged. If that changes your opinion, please feel free to change your vote.
So, a lot of my recent entries have been from twitter, and I've posted to the Journal less, perhaps as a result of having twitter as an option. There may be other reasons, including getting settled in the new job, house, schedule, etc.
I looked at my page recently and saw how much of it was twitter and wondered if it was redundant. Should I bridge the two, or use them separately? I know that I don't follow both if someone is, for instance, mirroring every post to a blog and LJ. Maybe Twitter is the same way.
I may not make any change, or I may not take the advice of collective wisdom, but I'm wondering what people think.
ETA: I found a new feature in the UI, which lets me turn off response (@SoAndSo) tweets being logged. If that changes your opinion, please feel free to change your vote.
no subject
Date: 2008-01-11 07:17 pm (UTC)