Should they stay or should they go?

[mcroft]

[Poll #1119608]

So, a lot of my recent entries have been from twitter, and I've posted to the Journal less, perhaps as a result of having twitter as an option. There may be other reasons, including getting settled in the new job, house, schedule, etc.

I looked at my page recently and saw how much of it was twitter and wondered if it was redundant. Should I bridge the two, or use them separately? I know that I don't follow both if someone is, for instance, mirroring every post to a blog and LJ. Maybe Twitter is the same way.

I may not make any change, or I may not take the advice of collective wisdom, but I'm wondering what people think.

ETA: I found a new feature in the UI, which lets me turn off response (@SoAndSo) tweets being logged. If that changes your opinion, please feel free to change your vote.

Comments

[sirvalence.livejournal.com]

It's your blog. You should post whatever you want to post. That's the most important thing. That having been said, I have little patience for skipping over posts that I won't read, and since the tweets make no sense to me at all, and there hasn't been much else on your blog for a while, I'd filtered your posts from my reading list. I consider that unfortunate, because you sometimes post things I want to read. (I only knew about this post because I saw Karen reading it.) So please, please, please, do what you want with your blog, but I probably won't read it while most of it is tweets.