Should they stay or should they go?
Jan. 11th, 2008 10:33 am[Poll #1119608]
So, a lot of my recent entries have been from twitter, and I've posted to the Journal less, perhaps as a result of having twitter as an option. There may be other reasons, including getting settled in the new job, house, schedule, etc.
I looked at my page recently and saw how much of it was twitter and wondered if it was redundant. Should I bridge the two, or use them separately? I know that I don't follow both if someone is, for instance, mirroring every post to a blog and LJ. Maybe Twitter is the same way.
I may not make any change, or I may not take the advice of collective wisdom, but I'm wondering what people think.
ETA: I found a new feature in the UI, which lets me turn off response (@SoAndSo) tweets being logged. If that changes your opinion, please feel free to change your vote.
So, a lot of my recent entries have been from twitter, and I've posted to the Journal less, perhaps as a result of having twitter as an option. There may be other reasons, including getting settled in the new job, house, schedule, etc.
I looked at my page recently and saw how much of it was twitter and wondered if it was redundant. Should I bridge the two, or use them separately? I know that I don't follow both if someone is, for instance, mirroring every post to a blog and LJ. Maybe Twitter is the same way.
I may not make any change, or I may not take the advice of collective wisdom, but I'm wondering what people think.
ETA: I found a new feature in the UI, which lets me turn off response (@SoAndSo) tweets being logged. If that changes your opinion, please feel free to change your vote.
no subject
Date: 2008-01-11 05:49 pm (UTC)The little observations into your daily lives are neat, but the one sided conversations are lost on me, so I just skip over them. Then again, it is your journal. Post what you want, when you want, and if we read it or not, that's our choice. There are far more things that are far more irritating on my F-list then Twitter entries.