Should they stay or should they go?

[mcroft]

[Poll #1119608]

So, a lot of my recent entries have been from twitter, and I've posted to the Journal less, perhaps as a result of having twitter as an option. There may be other reasons, including getting settled in the new job, house, schedule, etc.

I looked at my page recently and saw how much of it was twitter and wondered if it was redundant. Should I bridge the two, or use them separately? I know that I don't follow both if someone is, for instance, mirroring every post to a blog and LJ. Maybe Twitter is the same way.

I may not make any change, or I may not take the advice of collective wisdom, but I'm wondering what people think.

ETA: I found a new feature in the UI, which lets me turn off response (@SoAndSo) tweets being logged. If that changes your opinion, please feel free to change your vote.

Comments

[shadowflyer.livejournal.com]

I'm of two minds about Twitter, much the way your Twitter content is of two categories: 1) one-line observations that make some sense standing alone, and B) conversation fragments that I can sometimes piece together from other people's twitters and sometimes not. When you and imlass were on the road, it was kind of fun following your progress by way of the one-line observations. But lately the conversation fragments dominate, and that's just confusing and awkward.