Fashion: Art or Craft?
Sep. 15th, 2006 09:27 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
mcroftAccording to ParticleMan (a nice guy I haven't ever met), there's a move afoot to change the status of "Fashion" from a craft to an art, which really means there's an attempt by the fashion industry to secure for themselves the benefits of copyright protection for the design of clothing.
It's an interesting argument, and there is certainly deceptive trade going on in copies of clothing and there's also clearly a lot of borrowing between designers. But copyright? I'm not convinced. ParticleMan is a law student who wants to go into copyright law, and he is.
P-Man says "The creator is entitled to protection of the unique expression of an idea (though not the idea itself)."
Anyone here have any thoughts (on this. Opinions on the Battle of Balaclava are not relevant...)?
It's an interesting argument, and there is certainly deceptive trade going on in copies of clothing and there's also clearly a lot of borrowing between designers. But copyright? I'm not convinced. ParticleMan is a law student who wants to go into copyright law, and he is.
P-Man says "The creator is entitled to protection of the unique expression of an idea (though not the idea itself)."
Anyone here have any thoughts (on this. Opinions on the Battle of Balaclava are not relevant...)?
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
no subject
Date: 2006-09-15 03:51 pm (UTC)The only result of this kind of legislation would be more lawsuits and more lawyers. That is totally unproductive.
(As for copyright law on the whole, I think it needs to be loosened *a lot*. The "70 years after the creator's death" rule for instance, will kill a lot of 20th century culture, IMO.)
arrr....
Date: 2006-09-15 05:13 pm (UTC)Re: arrr....
Date: 2006-09-17 12:55 pm (UTC)