Fashion: Art or Craft?
According to ParticleMan (a nice guy I haven't ever met), there's a move afoot to change the status of "Fashion" from a craft to an art, which really means there's an attempt by the fashion industry to secure for themselves the benefits of copyright protection for the design of clothing.
It's an interesting argument, and there is certainly deceptive trade going on in copies of clothing and there's also clearly a lot of borrowing between designers. But copyright? I'm not convinced. ParticleMan is a law student who wants to go into copyright law, and he is.
P-Man says "The creator is entitled to protection of the unique expression of an idea (though not the idea itself)."
Anyone here have any thoughts (on this. Opinions on the Battle of Balaclava are not relevant...)?
It's an interesting argument, and there is certainly deceptive trade going on in copies of clothing and there's also clearly a lot of borrowing between designers. But copyright? I'm not convinced. ParticleMan is a law student who wants to go into copyright law, and he is.
P-Man says "The creator is entitled to protection of the unique expression of an idea (though not the idea itself)."
Anyone here have any thoughts (on this. Opinions on the Battle of Balaclava are not relevant...)?
no subject
no subject
no subject
I'm still trying to differentiate fashion from upholstery for purposes of protection here.
no subject
no subject
It occurred to me that if they do get copyright protection, they may drive the Singer corporation out of business as a manufacturer of a device for circumventing copyright.
no subject
If you outlaw sewing machines, only outlaws (and my Mom) will have sewing machines!
snarky brujah moment
Charge of the Light Luvrhino
On a tactical level, one can't certainly shouldn't underestimate the lack of cohesion and communication on the Russians part for why their attack failed. However, on a overall strategic level it would not make a difference, for the Allies would have rallied even had the Russians carried the day.
no subject
I don't think it's a good idea, but I'm having a hard time figuring out why. Assuming that full copyright protection is afforded to all fashion designs, though, wouldn't photographs of people wearing designs created in the past century be derivative works?
no subject
The only result of this kind of legislation would be more lawsuits and more lawyers. That is totally unproductive.
(As for copyright law on the whole, I think it needs to be loosened *a lot*. The "70 years after the creator's death" rule for instance, will kill a lot of 20th century culture, IMO.)
arrr....
Re: arrr....